Turn tokenization ideas into a structured verdict.

TVAC (Tokenization Value‑Add Calculator) is an informational decision‑support tool. It helps you evaluate whether a specific tokenization design is likely to create net added value versus a conventional structure—and it produces a structured, shareable report.

TVAC helps you make trade‑offs explicit early—before you spend significant time and money on structuring, legal work, vendor selection, or procurement.

You get a clear verdict, a factor‑by‑factor rationale, explicit assumptions, and concrete design levers you can use to improve feasibility and added value.

TVAC is useful if you are evaluating, designing, or reviewing a tokenization initiative—as an asset owner/issuer, project team, investment team, legal/compliance function, or service provider.

It is especially helpful when multiple stakeholders need a shared, structured basis for discussion.

TVAC uses a consistent five‑factor model:

Added Value = (New Opportunities + Cost Savings + Risk Reduction) – (Tokenization Costs + New Risks)

Each factor is scored on a 0–10 scale using predefined criteria. TVAC also applies a stakeholder lens (at minimum: Asset Owner, Investor, Service Providers) to highlight who captures upside and who bears costs/risks.

The verdict is derived from the Added Value profile and the internal consistency of the design (jurisdictions, investor scope, custody, venue, settlement, disclosure, and operating model).

Typical outcomes include Go, Conditional Go, Borderline, or No‑Go—with clear “conditions to proceed” when relevant.

Typically: asset type, jurisdictions, investor scope, legal wrapper, custody and venue assumptions, settlement/cash‑leg approach, distribution thesis, and key constraints.

TVAC also reports an input completeness score and lists missing fields and explicit assumptions—so thin or contradictory inputs are treated more cautiously.

A Deep Assessment is a board‑ready report (typically 30+ pages) that includes:

• Executive summary (verdict, key drivers, “conditions to proceed”)
• Asset‑class & market context
• Analysis result (assumptions, value pathways, investor segmentation, operational costs, regulatory path, custody/venue fit, risk register)
• How the assessment was produced + how Added Value is computed
• Stakeholder added value (who benefits, who pays, who bears risk)
• Factor breakdown, risk heatmap, and mitigation focus
• Recommendations, what‑if scenarios, and an indicative implementation roadmap

TVAC does not claim to know every final cost item with absolute precision. That level of detail usually only emerges later, after legal structuring, vendor selection, technical scoping, and implementation planning.

What TVAC does provide is a structured, methodology-based evaluation of whether a project appears likely to generate net added value given the information available. It assesses the case based on its core characteristics, likely opportunity profile, probable cost and risk drivers, and the overall logic of the proposed tokenization model.

In short, TVAC is a decision-support tool for evaluating feasibility and value creation under real-world uncertainty — not a substitute for final budgeting, legal advice, or underwriting.

No—not in the sense of claiming a giant benchmark database built from the full budgets, invoices, and time sheets of a large number of completed projects.

TVAC is based on a fixed methodology, explicit scoring criteria, and accumulated domain understanding of how tokenization cases typically create opportunities, generate costs, and introduce new risks across different structures and asset types.

The goal is not to pretend that every future project can be priced with accounting-level precision in advance. The goal is to provide a disciplined, transparent, and case-specific feasibility assessment that helps users judge whether a project looks commercially and structurally credible before moving into deeper budgeting and implementation work.

TVAC is designed for consistency and defensibility: fixed factor definitions, calibrated scoring criteria, and transparent reasoning tied to your inputs.

It is also intentionally conservative: when a case sits between verdict bands, the more cautious interpretation is usually chosen.

No. TVAC provides informational decision‑support only. Jurisdiction‑specific matters must always be validated with qualified professionals.

You should avoid entering sensitive personal data or confidential commercial details. Use anonymised placeholders where possible, and share only what is necessary to evaluate structure and feasibility.

If you have strict procurement or data‑handling requirements, treat TVAC as part of a governed workflow and apply your internal controls.

Yes. The report surfaces the few levers most likely to move the outcome: how to reduce costs/risks, tighten the operating model, and make distribution/liquidity assumptions more credible.

It also includes structured next steps and an indicative roadmap you can use for planning and stakeholder alignment.